Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1143320180070010027
Therapeutic Science for Neurorehabilitation
2018 Volume.7 No. 1 p.27 ~ p.35
Assessments of Spatial Neglect : Comparison of KF-NAP (Kessler Foundation ? Neglect Assessment Process) and Pencil-Paper test
Kim Seon-Kyeom

Abstract
Objective : The aim of this study was to identify correlation between KF-NAP and Pencil-Paper test(Line bisection test, Letter cancellation, Albert¡¯s test) and to determine the high sensitive assessment tool for spatial neglect.

Method : Thirty-two stroke patients who admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit at the medical center in Seoul from September, 2014 to September, 2015 were included in our research. They all have spatial neglect (male=19, female=13, the average age 61.8). KF-NAP and Pencil-Paper test were performed within 7 days. The detection of spatial neglect was analyzed by total scores of each assessments.

Results : The highest sensitivity assessments of spatial neglect was KF-NAP. The detection of spatial neglect through KF-NAP was 93.8% (Line bisection test 53.1, Letter cancellation 53.1%, Albert¡¯s test 37.5%). Line bisection test (r=.430), Letter cancellation(r=.641), Albert¡¯s test(r=.398) and KF-NAP scores had significant correlation(p<0.05).

Conclusion : KF-NAP is higher sensitive in comparison with Pencil-Paper test for detection of spatial neglect as the assessment tool of spatial neglect during activities daily livings of patients and neglect severity could be assessed with KF-NAP. Therefore, KF-NAP is recommended for assessment of spatial neglect.
KEYWORD
Assessment of spatial neglect, KF-NAP, Pencil-Paper test, Spatial neglect
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)